American Institute of Biological Sciences

Serving Biology and Society

About AIBS: Contact Us
Executive Director's Blog  Twitter
Webinars
Media Inquiries
Organization Membership
Individual Membership
Membership Directories
AIBS Council News
Peer Review (SPARS)
Public Policy Office
Education Office
Annual Meeting
Special Symposia
Presidents' Summits
Student Chapters
Awards
Donate to AIBS
Feeds feed icon
Online Social Networking
E-mail Updates
Announcements
AIBS News
BioScience Magazine
BioScience Press Releases
ActionBioscience.org
BioOne
Media Library
Public Policy Reports
Position Statements
Washington Watch
Education Reports
Eye on Education
Bookstore
Classified Ads
Evolution Initiatives
Diversity Programs
NESCent
Conference Services
Publication Services
Society Management

Analysis fingers causes of desertification

August 30, 2004

A meta-analysis published in the September 2004 issue of BioScience concludes that desertification is driven by a limited group of core variables, most prominently climatic factors that lead to reduced rainfall, technological factors, institutional and policy factors, and economic factors. The technological factors include innovations such as the adoption of water pumps, boreholes, and dams. The institutional and policy factors include agricultural growth policies such as land distribution and redistribution. These variables, the analysis reveals, drive proximate causes of desertification such as the expansion of cropland and overgrazing, the extension of infrastructure, increased aridity, and wood extraction.

Desertification, sometimes referred to as dryland degradation, directly affects over 250 million people and threatens another billion in at-risk countries, many of them among the world's poorest. The new meta-analysis, conducted by Helmut J. Geist and Eric F. Lambin of the University of Louvain in Belgium and the Land Use and Cover Change International Project, considered 132 case studies of dryland degradation. The results challenge single-factor explanations that put the most of the blame for desertification on the rural poor and nomadic populations. Nor do the results support the notion that desertification is the result of irreducibly complex processes. Rather, the analysis suggests that desertification is best explained by a limited number of recurrent pathways that include regionally distinct combinations of factors and feedbacks. Public and individual decisions leading to desertification largely respond to national-scale policies aimed at promoting advanced land-use technologies and creating new economic opportunities.

Journalists may obtain copies of the article by contacting Donna Royston, AIBS communications representative.

Contact

Donna Royston, Communications Representative.
+1.202.628.1500 x 261

 

back to AIBS BioScience Press Releases

American Institute of
Biological Sciences
1444 I Street, NW · Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005
T 202.628.1500
F 202.628.1509
- Contact Us -
© AIBS, 2009