American Institute of Biological Sciences

Serving Biology and Society

About AIBS: Contact Us
Executive Director's Blog
Media Inquiries
Organization Membership
Individual Membership
Membership Directories
AIBS Council News
Peer Review (SPARS)
Public Policy Office
Education Office
Science Office
Annual Meeting
Special Symposia
Presidents' Summits
Student Chapters
Awards
Donate to AIBS
Site Map
Feeds feed icon
Online Social Networking
E-mail Updates
Announcements
AIBS News
BioScience Magazine
BioScience Press Releases
ActionBioscience.org
BioOne
Media Library
Public Policy Reports
Position Statements
Washington Watch
Education Reports
Eye on Education
Bookstore
Classified Ads
Evolution Initiatives
Diversity Programs
NEON
NESCent
Conference Services
Publication Services
Society Management

Flawed Studies Assess Dredge-and-fill Programs to Protect Coastlines

October 1, 2005

Massive dredge-and-fill projects have become a common method of combating shoreline erosion as sea level rises and major storms become more common. Such "beach nourishment" projects deposit millions of cubic meters of fill in beach systems. This can bury shallow reefs and degrade other beach habitats, depressing nesting in sea turtles and reducing the densities of prey for shorebirds, fishes, and crabs.

In the October 2005 issue of BioScience, the monthly journal of the American Institute of Biological Sciences, marine scientists Charles H. Peterson of the University of North Carolina and Melanie J. Bishop, now of the University of Technology in Sydney, Australia, report that despite expensive, multidecadal monitoring, the majority of studies of the ecological impacts of beach nourishment are scientifically inadequate and suffer from critical flaws, improper analyses, and unjustified interpretations. Peterson and Bishop's survey discovered that monitoring is typically conducted by project promoters with no independent peer review. They note that the US Army Corps of Engineers and state permitting agencies, which oversee most of the monitoring studies, do not have expertise adequate to assess them. Peterson and Bishop conclude that reform of agency practices is urgently needed as the cumulative risk of severe ecological impacts grows.

The complete list of research articles in the October 2005 issue of BioScience is as follows:
How Much Is Enough? The Recurrent Problem of Setting Measurable Objectives in Conservation. Timothy H. Tear et al.
Principles of the Atmospheric Pathway for Invasive Species Applied to Soybean Rust. Scott A. Isard et al.
Vulnerability of Northern Prairie Wetlands to Climate Change. W. Carter Johnson et al.
Ecology, Values, and Objectivity: Advancing the Debate. Tabatha J. Wallington and Susan A. Moore.
Employment in the Life Sciences: A Mixed Outlook. Eleanor L. Babco and Jolene Kay Jesse.
Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Beach Nourishment. Charles H. Peterson and Melanie J. Bishop.

Contact

Donna Royston, Communications Representative.
+1.202.628.1500 ext. 261

 

back to BioScience Press Releases

The American Institute of
Biological Sciences
1444 I Street, NW · Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005
T 202.628.1500
F 202.628.1509
- Contact Us -
© AIBS, 2008