American Institute of Biological Sciences

Serving Biology and Society

About AIBS: Contact Us
Executive Director's Blog
Media Inquiries
Organization Membership
Individual Membership
Membership Directories
AIBS Council News
Peer Review (SPARS)
Public Policy Office
Education Office
Science Office
Annual Meeting
Special Symposia
Presidents' Summits
Student Chapters
Awards
Donate to AIBS
Site Map
Feeds feed icon
Online Social Networking
E-mail Updates
Announcements
AIBS News
BioScience Magazine
BioScience Press Releases
ActionBioscience.org
BioOne
Media Library
Public Policy Reports
Position Statements
Washington Watch
Education Reports
Eye on Education
Bookstore
Classified Ads
Evolution Initiatives
Diversity Programs
NEON
NESCent
Conference Services
Publication Services
Society Management

New Parks to Protect Animals Seen as Feasible

September 1, 2006
Read the full article (PDF)

An article in the September 2006 issue of BioScience, the monthly journal of the American Institute of Biological Sciences, provides some rare good news for conservation biologists. Authors L. J. Gorenflo and Katrina Brandon used GIS (geographic information system) technology to study some 4,000 locations around the world that harbor animals vulnerable to extinction, yet lie outside areas protected by conservation regulations. Gorenflo and Brandon concluded that many of these "gap" locations, which tend to occur disproportionately in the tropics, on islands, and in mountains, are feasible candidates for conservation because they include large tracts of conservation–compatible habitat, their human population is sparse, and they are not attractive for agriculture. Most of the gap locations did not feature high levels of threat from humans.

Gorenflo and Brandon's analysis did point to potential difficulties in establishing protected areas in some parts of the world. Human presence seems to be a hindrance to conservation in gap locations situated near coasts, including islands. In other regions, such as parts of the Andes, Mexico, Brazil, and Africa, some gap locations have agricultural potential, which suggests that conservation measures there might be opposed by farming interests. Other factors beyond the scope of Gorenflo and Brandon's analysis—the governance and market conditions of an area, for example—also will affect the prospects for conservation.

Nevertheless, the article's findings suggest that efforts to establish new protected areas may be worthwhile in many parts of the world. The complete list of research articles in the September 2006 issue of BioScience is as follows:

Key Human Dimensions of Gaps in Global Biodiversity Conservation.
L. J. Gorenflo and Katrina Brandon

Limestone Karsts of Southeast Asia: Imperiled Arks of Biodiversity.
Reuben Clements, Navjot S. Sodhi, Menno Schilthuizen, and Peter K. L. Ng

Sustainable Management of Insect Herbivores in Grassland Ecosystems: New Perspectives in Grasshopper Control.
David H. Branson, Anthony Joern, and Gregory A. Sword

A Rough Guide to Interdisciplinarity: Graduate Student Perspectives.
Jessica K. Graybill, Sarah Dooling, Vivek Shandas, John Withey, Adrienne Greve, and Gregory L. Simon

Issues in Species Recovery: An Example Based on the Wyoming Toad.
Victoria J. Drietz

Contact

Donna Royston, Communications Representative.
+1.202.628.1500 ext. 261

 

back to BioScience Press Releases

The American Institute of
Biological Sciences
1444 I Street, NW · Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005
T 202.628.1500
F 202.628.1509
- Contact Us -
© AIBS, 2008