American Institute of Biological Sciences

Serving Biology and Society

About AIBS: Contact Us
Executive Director's Blog
Media Inquiries
Organization Membership
Individual Membership
Membership Directories
AIBS Council News
Peer Review (SPARS)
Public Policy Office
Education Office
Science Office
Annual Meeting
Special Symposia
Presidents' Summits
Student Chapters
Awards
Donate to AIBS
Site Map
Feeds feed icon
Online Social Networking
E-mail Updates
Announcements
AIBS News
BioScience Magazine
BioScience Press Releases
ActionBioscience.org
BioOne
Media Library
Public Policy Reports
Position Statements
Washington Watch
Education Reports
Eye on Education
Bookstore
Classified Ads
Evolution Initiatives
Diversity Programs
NEON
NESCent
Conference Services
Publication Services
Society Management

More Recycling on the Farm Could Reduce Environmental Problems

April 30, 2007
Read the full article (PDF)

Growing environmental problems resulting from farming argue for a shift toward practices that use lower inputs of pesticides and energy and promote more recycling of energy and materials, according to an article published in the May 2007 issue of BioScience. The author, Craig J. Pearson, of the University of Guelph, documents how semiclosed agricultural systems—which he terms “regenerative”—could enhance global sustainability of biological resources, curtail greenhouse gas emissions and groundwater contamination, and reduce farming’s reliance on oil imports and water.

A switch to regenerative agriculture would involve a variety of changes, including reduced use of inorganic fertilizers and more on-farm energy generation from wind and from fermentation of biosolids. It would also curtail overcropping and groundwater contamination, the result in part of leakage from manure storage. Yet despite some similarities to organic farming, regenerative agriculture is distinct from it; for example, regenerative agriculture could accommodate some use of fertilizers and pesticides to minimize waste, and it would exploit robotic systems.

The approach would entail more human labor, which is costly, and it may lower yields. However, as Pearson’s summary of several studies of organic farming suggests, price premiums could overcome this disadvantage, and Pearson proposes that social benefits from higher labor density could be expected. He argues that existing funding programs for farmers could be modified to encourage more regenerative agriculture, and suggests that philanthropists and professional bodies could spur the change in agronomic systems.

The complete list of research articles in the May 2007 issue of BioScience is as follows:

The Paddlefish Rostrum as an Electrosensory Organ: A Novel Adaptation for Plankton Feeding
Lon A. Wilkens and Michael H. Hofmann

Regenerative, Semiclosed Systems: A Priority for Twenty-First-Century Agriculture
Craig J. Pearson

What’s in Noah’s Wallet? Land Conservation Spending in the United States
Jeff Lerner, Janet Mackey, and Frank Casey

Noah at the Ballot Box: Status and Challenges
Peter S. Szabo

Species Invasions from Commerce in Live Aquatic Organisms: Problems and Possible Solutions
Reuben P. Keller and David M. Lodge

Amphibian Population Declines: Evolutionary Considerations
Andrew R. Blaustein and Betsy A. Bancroft

Contact

Samantha Katz
Director of Education and Outreach
202.628.1500 x206

 

back to BioScience Press Releases

The American Institute of
Biological Sciences
1444 I Street, NW · Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005
T 202.628.1500
F 202.628.1509
- Contact Us -
© AIBS, 2008