In the April 2008 Washington Watch article in BioScience, Megan Kelhart reports on politicization of science and recent efforts to convene a presidential debate on science.
An excerpt from the article follows:
Whether in response to the “politicization” of science, or simply to ensure that public policy is informed by science, many scientists are mobilizing and becoming more active in the public policy arena. Whatever the reason, science is more prominent in the 2008 race for the presidency than it has been in other races. In December 2007, a grassroots group called Science Debate 2008 issued a public call for a presidential debate on science.
Supporters of Science Debate 2008 argue that science should be a central theme in the presidential election because the important scientific challenges facing the United States call for precise, unbiased scientific data to support policy decisions, and because the country needs to encourage scientific and technological innovation to stay competitive in the global marketplace. Others maintain that although presidential nominees should discuss climate change and energy policy, those issues are more political than scientific.
In an interview on 11 January with Ira Flatow…
To continue reading this article for free, please go to http://www.aibs.org/washington-watch/washingtonwatch2008_04.html
back to Public Policy Reports